Sustainable forest management augments diversity of vascular plants in German forests
Bibliographic record
Abstract
IntroductionThere exists a need in politics, administration, and in practice of forest management for knowledge anddecision support information on conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity in German forests.Therefore the present study investigated the following hypotheses:1)As a consequence of forest management, there exists a higher number of vascular plant species per unitarea in the herb layer of managed forests in relation to ecologically comparable non managed forests.2)With growing management intensity, species composition in vascular plants shifts towards higherfractions of indicator species for disturbance.MethodsVegetation analysis was conducted in 1997 and 1998 in broadleaved lowland forests of Northern Germany onrich soils (county of Herzogtum Lauenburg, east of Hamburg: “SH”) as well as on moderately rich soils(beech,Fagus silvatica, forests of the Mueritz National Park “MV”). Virgin forests do not exist in Germany. So,non-managed (at least for 30 years, up to more than 150 years) forests were contrasted against managed forestsof different management intensity. The latter was measured among others as cubic metres of timber taken perhectare and per year. Soil quality and water supply as well as tree species composition and stand age were ascomparable as possible. Contrary to no longer managed forests, thinning and final timber harvest wereconducted in managed forests.ResultsIn almost every comparison, higher mean species numbers per unit area were found in managed forests asopposed to no longer managed forests (Fig. 1 and 2).In every investigated forest stand, managed or not, the widespread and frequent indicator species for the foresttypes ofQuerco-FageteaandFagetalia(“typical” forest species in a narrow sense)existed in similar densities. Onthe other hand, a significantly higher distribution and density was observed in managed forests for nitrophytesand for indicator species for light (open canopy) and for soil compaction (Tab. 1 and 2). The steadyness valuesof these latter species grows further with raising intensity of forest management (Tab. 1, Fig. 1).ConclusionsHigher numbers of vascular plant species per unit area are possible in managed forests due to a better lightclimate in the herb layer as a consequence of forest operations for timber harvest that open up the canopy.Additionally, heterogeneous soil conditions (bare, accumulated, compacted, etc.) are caused by timber movingoperations and a higher forest road density, both leading to better conditions for establishment and growth ofvascular plants at least temporarily.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".