MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7053008490

Sustainable forest management augments diversity of vascular plants in German forests

2001· other· en· W7053008490 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMultilingual Matters (Channel View Publications) · 2001
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Measurements
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersU.S. Forest ServiceCanadian Forest ServiceParks CanadaMinistry of Natural ResourcesNatural Resources CanadaEarthwatch Institute
KeywordsForest managementSustainable forest managementSpecies diversityThinningLoggingForest inventoryBiodiversitySustainable managementSecondary forest
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IntroductionThere exists a need in politics, administration, and in practice of forest management for knowledge anddecision support information on conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity in German forests.Therefore the present study investigated the following hypotheses:1)As a consequence of forest management, there exists a higher number of vascular plant species per unitarea in the herb layer of managed forests in relation to ecologically comparable non managed forests.2)With growing management intensity, species composition in vascular plants shifts towards higherfractions of indicator species for disturbance.MethodsVegetation analysis was conducted in 1997 and 1998 in broadleaved lowland forests of Northern Germany onrich soils (county of Herzogtum Lauenburg, east of Hamburg: “SH”) as well as on moderately rich soils(beech,Fagus silvatica, forests of the Mueritz National Park “MV”). Virgin forests do not exist in Germany. So,non-managed (at least for 30 years, up to more than 150 years) forests were contrasted against managed forestsof different management intensity. The latter was measured among others as cubic metres of timber taken perhectare and per year. Soil quality and water supply as well as tree species composition and stand age were ascomparable as possible. Contrary to no longer managed forests, thinning and final timber harvest wereconducted in managed forests.ResultsIn almost every comparison, higher mean species numbers per unit area were found in managed forests asopposed to no longer managed forests (Fig. 1 and 2).In every investigated forest stand, managed or not, the widespread and frequent indicator species for the foresttypes ofQuerco-FageteaandFagetalia(“typical” forest species in a narrow sense)existed in similar densities. Onthe other hand, a significantly higher distribution and density was observed in managed forests for nitrophytesand for indicator species for light (open canopy) and for soil compaction (Tab. 1 and 2). The steadyness valuesof these latter species grows further with raising intensity of forest management (Tab. 1, Fig. 1).ConclusionsHigher numbers of vascular plant species per unit area are possible in managed forests due to a better lightclimate in the herb layer as a consequence of forest operations for timber harvest that open up the canopy.Additionally, heterogeneous soil conditions (bare, accumulated, compacted, etc.) are caused by timber movingoperations and a higher forest road density, both leading to better conditions for establishment and growth ofvascular plants at least temporarily.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.227
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it