MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7053064518

Studies on the differences between in-vivo and in-vitro matured mouse oocytes priming with or without gonadotropins

2007· dissertation· en· W7053064518 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2007
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNuclear reactor physics and engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of Human Development, Child and Youth HealthNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsOocyteStimulationIn vitro maturationIn vitroIn vivoCytoplasmPriming (agriculture)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acquisition of full developmental competence of oocytes not only occurs during growth stage, and the final preparation during oocyte maturation is also critical. Previous studies have shown that nuclear maturation can occur spontaneously following culture in vitro; however, there may be some insufficiency in cytoplasmic maturation of the in vitro matured oocytes. But till now, the differences of the events of cytoplasmic maturation between in vitro and in vivo matured oocytes are still not clear. Ovarian stimulation by gonadotrophins is used to permits the growth and development of follicles, to time the initiation of pre-ovulatory oocyte maturation, and to increase the numbers of oocytes ovulated. It is one of the foundations of current treatments of human infertility. The success of clinical IVF has been depending on generation of matured oocytes at high frequency. However, ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins is associated with side effects and complications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.106
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicNuclear reactor physics and engineeringFrench-language works237,207