MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7053068988

SUBSURFACE AND SURFACE TILLAGE PRACTICES AND THEIR EFFECTS ON STRUCTURE, PERMEABILITY AND CROP YIELD IN A CHERNOZEMIC AND SOLONETZIC SOIL

2018· dissertation· en· W7053068988 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTillageStrawSoil waterPloughSoil structureInfiltration (HVAC)Permeability (electromagnetism)Bulk density
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fall tillage on the Canadian prairies may involve subsurface tillage (subsoiling) and surface tillage operations. These tillage practices alter soil physical properties such as aggregation, strength, bulk density, air and water permeability that can subsequently affect growth and yield of following crops. Reclaiming compacted Chernozemic and Solonetzic soils with hardpan B horizons may be possible through subsoiling operations to loosen the soil to depth e.g. ~30cm, while surface tillage operations such as tandem disc and vertical tillage can be used to get rid of recalcitrant crop residues like flax straw by incorporation to ~ 10cm. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of subsurface and surface tillage on soil physical properties and subsequent crop yield. Subsoiling treatments were applied to wheel traffic compacted and non-compacted Chernozemic and Solonetzic soils at a site in south-central Saskatchewan, Canada. Subsoiling increased air permeability in the compacted Chernozemic soil from 4.5x10-7 m sec-1 to 2.9x10-6 m sec-1. The subsoiler also significantly reduced soil bulk density and soil strength in both soil types. Subsoiling increased crop production on only one soil type; the long-term wheel traffic compacted Solonetzic soil, which had the highest soil strength (> 2000 kPa), where canola grain yield was increased by 1,100 kg ha-1. Effects of the subsoiling on soil physical properties and crop yield diminished greatly in the second year after subsoiling. Vertical tillage in the Chernozemic soil to incorporate flax straw tended to decrease water infiltration and air permeability compared to the raking and burning treatment and the no-till, no-burn control. Surface tillage of the flax stubble using tandem disk or vertical tillage implement, raking and burning, and direct seeding into the flax stubble all had similar wheat and pea yields in the in the first and second year of the study. When considering fall tillage, subsoiling may be most effectively applied to long-term wheel traffic compacted areas of a field with identified high soil strength. Surface tillage, raking and burning to reduce perceived residue interference may not be required if residue chopping and spreading by the combine at harvest is effective.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.480
Threshold uncertainty score0.955

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→