MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7053100255

TELEWORK New Way of Working in 21st Century

2012· article· en· W7053100255 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScience · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPlasma Diagnostics and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Promotion (chess)Cover (algebra)Member statesStatistical analysisData collectionQualitative analysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Even if the issue of telework (distant work, smart work) can be found in the European Commission’s agenda since mid of 1990s statistical data on employees working as teleworkers is still low. Also data on teleworkers in member states differ. The distinctive north-south differences in the take up of telework in the Europe are clearly shown. In 2005 the highest rate 14,4% involved in telework at least “a quarter of the time” or more was in Denmark, but the lowest 2,3% in Italy.
\nTherefore the purpose of the research is to analyze current regulatory framework and policies in EU level for promotion and development of telework. The research will also cover statistical overview of telework in Europe and analysis of different forms of implementation of telework in different member states. Qualitative analysis on telework development in case of Latvia will be provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.353
Threshold uncertainty score0.109

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScienceSame topicPlasma Diagnostics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207