A system of care for children and adolescents with emotional and behavioural disorders
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The system of care model as outlined by Stroul and Friedman (1986, 1994) has been adopted by the Province of Manitoba in an effort to better meet the needs of children and adolescents with severe emotional and behavioural disorders [EBD] (Manitoba Education, Citizenship and Youth, Manitoba Family Services, Manitoba Health & Manitoba Justice, 1995).This study reports on the Manitoba model, through a case study approach, which includes the perspectives of parents, foster parents, social workers and teachers involved in supporling children and adolescents with EBD.Qualitative data obtained from these participants was used to determine whether or not the system of care was achieving its stated objectives.Several factors that interfered with therealization of a true systern of care from the perspectives of key participants in the process are discussed.Suggestions to improve the system of care in Manitoba to make it more responsive to the needs of children and adolescents with EBD and their families are proposed.lV
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it