Turismo indigeno. Un progetto per un Totem Resting Park a Vancouver Island
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Itinerari che fino a qualche tempo fa costituivano dei meri contesti di ricerca etnografica per gli antropologi e sembravano essere poco attraenti per i turisti, oggi si stanno aprendo a flussi sempre più massici anche grazie a miglioramenti delle reti transnazionali e delle infrastrutture. Questo contributo prende le mosse da alcune richieste del capo e dell’ex capo della comunità indigena dei Kwakiutl della costa nord-orientale canadese che sono interessati a sviluppare un progetto turistico attorno ad un totem pole. La comunità Kwakiutl intende incrementare il Totem Resting Park a Vancouver Island e mira a realizzare un luogo di sepoltura per totem morenti all’interno delle loro terre ancestrali. Questo progetto non ha solo uno scopo turistico, ma serve anche da laboratorio per valutare l’importanza di affrontare la fine della vita per i totem danneggiati dal tempo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".