MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7053206549

UA Little Rock Seminar in Public History (HIST 7391) files on the Arkansas Public Policy Panel, 2013

2013· other· en· W7053206549 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeptidase Inhibition and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublic historyPublic policyPolicy studiesGeorge (robot)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This collection contains the project report, interview transcripts, and CDs from the University of Arkansas at Little Rock's Seminar in Public History's 2013 project, "The Dragon Slayers: A History of the Arkansas Public Policy Panel," directed by Deborah J. Baldwin, Ph.D., which includes a history of the Arkansas Public Policy Panel and interviews with former and current members and directors.; Project Staff: Leah Berry, Megan Dunaway, Dewey Dykes, J. D. Gatlin, Rachel Jeffries, Ron Kelley, Adrienne McGill, Sarah Riva, and Britany Simmons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.513
Threshold uncertainty score0.695

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.008
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5130.194

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPeptidase Inhibition and Analysis→French-language works237,207→