Three Sectors, Three Stages of Organisation: Communal Management in the Grand Manan Lobster Fishery
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
"In the Grand Manan lobster fishery, as in many other local fisheries, there exists an informal communal management system separate from the Canadian governmental management regime. Communal management can be described as collective resource management occuring at a local level, originated and shaped by local harvesters. By its nature, communal management is appropriate to the local ecological, social and cultural community. Results of a study into the Grand Manan lobster fishery reveal three identifiable sectors each with a differing system of communal management. This paper documents the intricacies of these three systems. The introduction of high-tech devices and new gear technology has precipitated changes in the spatial patterns of lobster fishing in this community resulting in the division of the fishery into three sectors. The inshore, offshore, and below-the-ledges sectors are distinguished by geography and gear type. Because these three sectors have functioned in the community for varying lengths of time, this situation offers a valuable opportunity to examine the developmental stages of communal management from the stability of a century-old system to the emergence of a new fishery. \n \n"The research leading to this paper was conducted from September through December, 1996, and for brief periods in the Spring of 1997. Grand Manan is a New Brunswick archipelago located at the mouth of the Bay of Fundy. Traditionally, lobster fishing practices were severely limited in this area by the extreme tide characteristics of the Bay of Fundy. In recent years, new technology as well as entrepreneurship of local fishers is allowing the Grand Manan fishermen to overcome some of the problems the strong tides inflict. Such innovation is changing not only fishing practices but also the fibers of the community mesh which informally govern the harvest of this common resource."
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it