MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7053256768

Vorsorge treffen - Unternehmen sichern Vorsorgevollmacht, Patientenverfügung, Interimsgeschäftsführung

2018· other· de· W7053256768 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languagede
FieldEngineering
TopicNuclear reactor physics and engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMontreal Protocol
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Allgemeine Lebensrisiken wie Unfall oder schwere Krankheit abzusichern, ist für Unter-nehmer von besonderer Bedeutung. Neben der Regelung privater Angelegenheiten muss auch die reibungslose Fortsetzung des Geschäftsbetriebs gesichert sein, um nicht in die Unternehmenskrise zu schlittern. 2009 hatte der Gesetzgeber endlich nach langer Diskussion die Patientenverfügung im Betreuungsrecht verankert und damit eine gewisse Rechtssicherheit für Ärzte, Betreuer und Bevollmächtigte im Umgang mit Patientenverfügungen geschaffen. Zwischenzeitlich liegen hierüber auch gesicherte Aussagen und einzelne Entscheidungen der Gerichte zum sicheren Umgang mit diesen Gestaltungsinstrumenten vor. Das Kompaktwissen zeigt die Möglichkeiten der privaten Absicherung durch Vorsorgevollmacht, Betreuungs- und Patientenverfügung und liefert Denkanstöße für Vorsorgemöglichkeiten im unternehmerischen Bereich. Dabei werden in der aktuellen 3. Auflage auch die Besonderheiten verschiedener Rechtsformen, wie etwa bei der GmbH oder der Partnerschaftsgesellschaft besprochen

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.153
Threshold uncertainty score0.512

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1530.071

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNuclear reactor physics and engineeringFrench-language works237,207