Unidad 1 - Promoci?n de la Salud en Colombia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Se presenta como complemento a la promoci?n de la salud los par?metros que se definieron en la primera Conferencia Internacional sobre la Promoci?n de la Salud reunida en Ottawa el d?a 21 de noviembre de 1986 CARTA dirigida a la consecuci?n del objetivo "Salud para Todos en el a?o 2.000". Esta conferencia fue, ante todo, una respuesta a la creciente demanda de una nueva concepci?n de la salud \np?blica en el mundo. Si bien las discusiones se centraron en las necesidades de los pa?ses industrializados, se tuvieron tambi?n en cuenta los problemas que ata?en a las dem?s regiones. La conferencia tom? como punto de partida los progresos alcanzados como consecuencia de la Declaraci?n de Alma Ata sobre la atenci?n primaria, el documento "Los Objetivos de la Salud para Todos" de la Organizaci?n \nMundial de la Salud, y el debate sobre la acci?n intersectorial para la salud sostenido recientemente en la Asamblea Mundial de la Salud.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.054 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".