MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7053284712

There is a moral wilderness requiring cultivation': Religious and social regulation in Perth, Upper Canada, 1817-1827

2021· dissertation· en· W7053284712 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser Design and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWildernessBaptismDissenting opinionPopulationDeedMoral characterMoral panicMoral authority
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis is an investigation of one man's efforts to monitor, regulate and improve the moral character of a pioneer settlement. The Reverend William Bell, a dissenting Scottish Presbyterian, immigrated to Upper Canada in 1817, settling in the ethnically and socially heterogeneous community of Perth. Upon arrival, Bell observed a population on the verge of a great moral crisis--a result, he believed, of the insufficient social restraints inherent in pioneer living. Determined to prevent Perth from degenerating into complete moral chaos, Bell set about reforming the community through his sermonizing, personal visits and withholding of church services. Despite some initial successes, the arrival of competing figures of religious authority and increasing friction over issues of baptism and church discipline diminished Bell's influence significantly. The continued presence of immoral behaviour after ten years in the region signalled Bell's failure to realize an idyllic Christian community in the New World.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.527

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0290.011
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Atrium (University of Guelph)Same topicLaser Design and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207