Voyage au pays des « vrais hommes ». L’utopie transculturelle dans La saga des Béothuks de Bernard Assiniwi
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La littérature amérindienne du Québec évolue en marge de la littérature québécoise. Les choix esthétiques des auteurs amérindiens paraissent épouser les mouvements généraux qui caractérisent maintes littératures nationales, allant de la promotion d’un particularisme qui s’établit envers et contre le « Blanc » à une ouverture progressive à l’Autre. Le parcours littéraire de Bernard Assiniwi semble particulièrement révélateur de ce trajet. Le présent article vise à démontrer, par une analyse tant formelle que thématique, le rôle prégnant de l’utopie dans le roman La saga des Béothuks, relativement à l’intégration d’une appartenance identitaire transculturelle, voire continentale, qu’il propose. \n \nThe Native American literature of Quebec evolves on the fringe of Quebec’s literature as a whole. The aesthetic choices of Native American authors seem to embrace the general movement that characterizes numerous national literatures, passing from the promotion of a particularism established towards and against the “White Man”, to a progressive opening to the Other. The literary itinerary of Bernard Assiniwi is particularly revealing in this way. This article’s main focus is to demonstrate, through a formal and a thematic analysis, the central role of utopia in the novel La saga des Béothuks , as related to the integration of a continental, or even transcultural, feeling of identity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".