Urban Air Mobility Electric Propulsor Test Stand
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Design Team 6 has been requested to design an Urban Air Mobility Electric Propulsor Stand under the University of Manitoba IDEA project by General Electric Aviation, StandardAero and WestCaRD. This stand must secure an electric propulsor with a propeller diameter ranging from 6 to 9 feet in the centerline of the wind tunnel at the Testing, Research and Development Centre in Winnipeg. This report showcases the final design of the stand with the initial concepts, a final detailed design and analysis. The team narrowed the choice down to two concepts with feedback from the client and a structured concept selection process. The best features of these concepts were combined to get to the final design. The final design is a two-tier 20.5 feet static design with 2 feet of vertical telescoping on the top. The vertical actuation on the top is achieved using a screw jack and an electric motor. The mostly static design with a dynamic component at the top allows us to achieve the accuracy required to keep the propulsor in the centerline of the wind tunnel while keeping the design sturdy and easy to maintain. This design is, therefore, a very balanced design to solve the presented problem.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".