MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7053465642

The use of the metallic saw in urban historical contexts. Analysis of test pit I in the Pedro Molina District, Guaymallén, Mendoza province

2009· article· en· W7053465642 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRepositorio Digital Institucional de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (Universidad de Buenos Aires) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser Design and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)UrbanizationQuarter (Canadian coin)Sequence (biology)Period (music)Deposition (geology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The bone analysis allowed to contrast favorably the use of the saw in an archaeological context around in Mendoza City wich functioned during the last quarter of the nineteenth century and the early twentieth century. The marks are mostly found to the Bos taurus species, in a typical discarding garbage urban context of this time. with a few species and represented mostly domestic animals introduced from Europe. The use of mechanical saw represents a major change in the final stretch of cattle managing, facilitating their subsequent distribution through the market. The sequence of deposition shows their use for a bounded period of time. The place digged is representative of the urban boundary –in late colonial and independent times- and the transition to the process of increasing urbanization occurred in the twentieth century, which was occupying an area of old farms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.496
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it