MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7053487225

Welfare in dairy cattle: Epidemiologic approaches for detection and treatment of lameness

2012· dissertation· en· W7053487225 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2012
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDairy Farmers of OntarioDairy Farmers of Canada
KeywordsHoofLamenessLyingLesionClawEtiologyBandageBruise
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lameness in dairy cattle is one of the primary welfare concerns in the industry. The objectives of this thesis were to investigate the use of an accelerometer for early detection of lameness, to describe the etiology and temporal changes in hoof lesion prevalence, and to assess treatments for two types of lesions that commonly cause lameness. The Pedometer Plus™ was first validated for lying behaviour and activity measurements and determined to accurately collect data on lying and on leg movement in the cow. This system was then used to determine if changes in activity and lying behaviour could be observed during presence of hoof lesions or during lameness. Lame cows decreased their activity and increased daily lying duration compared to non-lame cows. Activity, lying duration, and lying bouts were found to be altered with particular hoof lesions compared to cows without painful lesions. Lying duration was increased in periods where cows had painful lesions compared to periods when cows had no painful lesions present on their hooves. Digital dermatitis and sole ulcers were the most commonly observed painful hoof lesions. Presence of these lesions increased the odds of a cow having that lesion later in life. Additionally, the odds of developing a sole ulcer were higher in cows that had previously had hemorrhages. A randomized clinical trial compared the use of a tetracycline hydrochloride paste to use of a bandage or no treatment in digital dermatitis lesions. Lesion healing rates did not differ between the two treatments, while both were more effective than the negative control. An algometer was used to quantify pain at the lesion site and to verify decreasing pain responses between active, healing and healed lesions. The effect of therapeutic hoof block application on sound dairy cows was assessed, with lactating dairy cows randomly assigned to receive a block (n=10) or no treatment (n=10). Block application had little effect on the activity, lying behaviour and production of sound lactating dairy cattle. Application was associated with increased gait abnormality. These results provide potential dairy cattle welfare improvement through early identification and treatment of hoof lesions and lameness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Atrium (University of Guelph)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→