Volyn handwritten Tesluhiv Apostol of 1593-1594: codicological and paleographic research
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Our work aims to research the Tesluhiv Apostol manuscript of 1593-1594 (V. H. Korolenko Kharkiv State Scientific Library, Department of Manuscripts, rkp. 819172) using an electronic copy. The original manuscript is not available for study due to Russia's war against Ukraine. The tasks of the research are codicological, paleographic and orthographic attribution and archeographic description of the monument. Methodology. Source science, codicological, to obtaining the latest meta data. Scientific novelty. For the first time, the handwritten Tesluhiv Apostol of 1593-1594 was studied. Historiographical, codicological and paleographical study and archeographic description were carried out. It was established that the manuscript is a direct copy from the Apostle of 1525, printed by Francysk Skaryna. It has been proven that it was copied from the Church Slavonic manuscript of the Ukrainian edition, which was made from the Skaryna’s edition according to the usual orthographic rules of the Volyn book-writing school of the last quarter of the 16th century; the use of South Slavic orthograms is considered. Illustrations of the text of the manuscript are published for the first time. Conclusions. In Ukrainian literature from the second half of the 16th century, lists from the printed editions of the books of the Bible by Francysk Skaryna are gaining popularity. The Tesluhiv Apostle belongs to the Ukrainian manuscript Skaryniana. It was written in Volyn in 1593-1594 by priest Hermohen (Yermogen or Yarmogen, nicknamed Tikhonenia Yatskovich) in the town of Tesluhiv. Written in the Church Slavonic language of the Ukrainian edition, semi-statutory script, decorated with a simple folk ornament, with the stylization of Ukrainian embroidery.The Tesluhiv Apostol text was not directly copied from the printed Apostle of 1525 by Francysk Skaryna, but was copied from an already Ukrainized list and has attributing South Slavic orthograms. The monument needs in-depth codicological, paleographical, filigree, textological and linguistic research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".