MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7053562160

Young people not in education, employment or training (NEET), UK, Aug 2016

2016· other· en· W7053562160 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Education Resource Archive (University College London) · 2016
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser Design and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWork (physics)Table (database)Statistical analysisYoung adultTraining (meteorology)Quarter (Canadian coin)Percentage point
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Estimates of young people (aged 16 to 24) who are not in education, employment or training, by age and sex.The percentage of all young people in the UK who were NEET was 11.7%, down 0.3 percentage points from January to March 2016 and down 0.9 percentage points from a year earlier.Just under half (46%) of all young people in the UK who were NEET were looking for work and available for work and therefore classified as unemployed.The remainder were either not looking for work and/or not available for work and therefore classified as economically inactive. In this bulletinThis statistical bulletin contains estimates for young people not in education, employment or training (NEET) in the UK.An is available on our website.The bulletin is published 4 times article providing background information a year in February, May, August and November.All estimates discussed in this statistical bulletin are for the UK and are seasonally adjusted.The figures discussed in this statistical bulletin are obtained from the Labour Force Survey (a survey of households) and are therefore estimates, not precise figures.This statistical bulletin is accompanied by a in Excel spreadsheet format.data table Definition of young people not in education, employment or training (NEET) Young peopleFor this release, young people are defined as those aged 16 to 24.Estimates are also produced for the age groups 16 to 17 and 18 to 24 and broken down by sex.For April to June 2016, there were 62,000 people aged 16 to 17 who were NEET, up 5,000 from January to March 2016 and up 11,000 from a year earlier.There were 781,000 people aged 18 to 24 who were NEET, down 27,000 from January to March 2016 and down 89,000 from a year earlier. Unemployed young people who were NEETUnemployment measures people without a job who have been actively seeking work within the last 4 weeks and are available to start work in the next 2 weeks.For April to June 2016, there were 390,000 unemployed young people (aged 16 to 24) who were not in education, employment or training (NEET), up 9,000 from January to March 2016 and down 41,000 from a year earlier.For April to June 2016

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Education Resource Archive (University College London)Same topicLaser Design and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207