Výzkum možností rozšíření informovanosti obyvatel při nakládání s odpady v městské čísti Brno - střed
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The major concern of master thesis was to investigate opportunities of public awareness enhancement considering waste management in Brno central region. Firstly the legislative background and general terms were reported. Then state-of-art including for instance waste classification or waste collection points was of major interest. Subsequently own survey by mean of questionnaire interview was performed and obtained data were used for identification of current weaknesses. On the ground of obtained results own certain measures were designed to cover current drawbacks which may lead to enhancement of public awareness about waste management. Each and every designed measure was intensively discussed and consulted with head of department of waste management at local Brno-central region Municipality. For each measure official statement with comments and recommendations was obtained from head of department. Although designed measures were found beneficial and were considered for further application, the lack of available finance resources has been found as a major reason for temporary rejection. Nevertheless the City Municipality has obligated themselves to consider such measures in some of the future concepts for waste management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".