Діяльність канадсько-українських волонтерських обмінних молодіжних програм у рамках міжнародної співпраці Національного університету «Острозька Академія» та канадської організації «Канада-сСвіт-Молодь»(The performance of CanadianUkrainianvolunteer youth exchange programs in the framework ofinternational cooperation between the National University of "Ostroh Academy" and NGO "Canada World Youth")
Bibliographic record
Abstract
У статті проаналізовано досвід діяльності канадсько-українських волонтерських молодіжних програм обмінів у контексті реалізації міжнародної співпраці між Національним університетом «Острозька академія» та канадською неурядовою організацією «Канада-Світ-Молодь» з точки зору волонтерства, неформальної освіти та навчання за допомогою досвіду. Охарактеризовано зміст волонтерських програм обмінів, їх завдання, суб’єкти та форми реалізації. (The article analyzes the experience of Canadian-Ukrainian youth volunteer exchange programs in the context of international cooperation between the National University of "Ostroh Academy" and Canadian non-governmental organization "Canada World Youth" in terms of volunteering, non-formal education and experiential learning. The goal of youth volunteer exchange programs, their objectives, subjects, and means of youth volunteer exchange programs are defined.)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".