MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7053625145

Women Entrepreneurship: A Study of theRelationship between Motivation and Type ofBusiriess Ownership

2014· article· en· W7053625145 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCovenant University Repository (Covenant University) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser Design and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEntrepreneurshipConstruct (python library)Women entrepreneursAssociation (psychology)Business planBusiness developmentPlan (archaeology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The role assigned to entrepreneurship for economic growth and development especially in the developed economies such as USA, Britain, Japan, Canada and others made most developing economies including Nigeria to adjust their developmental concept and plan and see new enterprise development as very vital to their economic problems. As a result, women entrepreneurs have been seen as important construct in entrepreneurial development. However, more important is the understanding of the relationship between the fac\ors that motivate women into entrepreneurship and their choice of business ownership. This paper is therefore focused on examining this phenomenon. Data for analysis was obtained f rom t he women iists compiled by the Nigerian Chamber of Commerce, Industry, Mines and Agriculture, Nigerian Association of Small and Medium Enterprises and other associations of Nigerian Women in business. Model of correlation coefficient was used to analyze the data from the primary source through the instrument of questionnaire. The findings of the survey showed that there is s ignificant relationship between entrepreneurial motivation and women choice of business ownership. Recommendations for policy making were offered based on these findings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.172
Teacher spread0.148 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCovenant University Repository (Covenant University)Same topicLaser Design and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207