MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7053705455

КОРПУСНЫЕ ДАННЫЕ В РАЗРАБОТКЕ УЧЕБНЫХ СЛОВАРЕЙ СОЧЕТАЕМОСТИ

2023· article· en· W7053705455 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronic Archive of the Russian State Pedagogical University (Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser Design and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Term (time)HeadlineSubject (documents)Nucleofection
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article deals with the problems of using corpus data in educational lexicography. The data from traditional collocations dictionaries, such as the Oxford Collocations Dictionary for Students of English, are compared with the data extracted from the British National Corpus (BNC). The BNC is an approximately 100-million-word corpus of written and spoken British English (it is considered as a balanced corpus that contains texts from a wide range of different language genres and text domains). A corpus manager (a web-based tool for searching and retrieving lexical, grammatical and textual data) was employed in the study. Due to this it has become possible to analyze the data, generating frequency information, concordances (i.e. lists of all of the occurrences of a particular search term in a corpus, presented within the context in which they occur), keywords, collocations or carrying out statistical tests. In addition, the data from Dictionnaire des combinaisons de mots are compared with the data from the corpus-based electronic dictionary Antidote of the Canadian software company Druid informatique. This program comprises multiple dictionaries placed within a unified interface. The entry for each word displays its pronunciation, inflected forms, etymology, etc. along with their respective frequency. A frequency index is provided for each word; it indicates the relative frequency of the word in the six billion-word corpus. The presence of a dictionary of collocations that provides all the most significant combinations of the entry word with other words (functioning either as leading or dependent components), grouped by their syntactic function in the sentence and frequency is the most valuable feature of this program. The novelty of the work lies in the fact that it demonstrates the educational potential of corpus data in lexicography, in particular, in the field of compiling collocation dictionaries. The specific examples show how linguistic corpora can help comprehend the semantic, stylistic and syntactic specific features of words. The paper concludes that corpus data has many advantages over traditional dictionaries; at the same time, the limitations of corpus data in syntactic and semantic analysis are noted. In conclusion, the authors outline a project for developing a corpus-based pedagogical dictionary for students of Russian. © 2023 The Author(s).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.852
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it