MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7053751000

Variation in the AU(AT)-rich element within the 3'-untranslated region of PPP1R3 is associated with variation in plasma glucose in aboriginal Canadians

2011· article· en· W7053751000 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPostprandialType 2 diabetesImpaired glucose toleranceVariation (astronomy)Genetic variationDiabetes mellitusAlleleGeneQuantitative trait locus
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We are investigating associations between variations in candidate genes on chromosome 7q and diabetes-related phenotypes in Canadian Oji-Cree. One of these genes encodes the skeletal muscle regulatory G subunit of the glycogen- associated form of protein phosphatase 1 (PPPIR3), which may play a key role in muscle glycogen metabolism. There is a common 5-bp insertion-deletion polymorphism in a messenger ribonucleic acid-stabilizing AU(AT)-rich element within the 3'-untranslated region (UTR) of PPPIR3. The D allele had a frequency of 0.30 in the Oji-Cree. We found that this 3'-UTR variation of PPP1R3 was significantly associated with variation in 2-h postprandial glucose in adult Oji-Cree with type 2 diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). Specifically, Oji-Cree with diabetes or IGT who were D/D homozygotes had significantly lower 2-h postprandial plasma glucose than subjects with the other genotypes. There was no association of the PPPIR3 genotype either with the presence of type 2 diabetes or IGT or with other quantitative traits in this sample. These findings suggest that common PPPIR3 3'-UTR variation that potentially affects messenger ribonucleic acid stability is associated with variation in glycemia in Oji-Cree subjects with type 2 diabetes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.475
Threshold uncertainty score0.953

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong)Same topicMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207