MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7053805207

Zakhor: a holocaust memorial museum for mourning and healing

2023· dissertation· en· W7053805207 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser Design and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExhibitionNarrativeSpatializationCreativityExperiential learningThe HolocaustReuseSpace (punctuation)StorytellingKey (lock)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the immediate connection grows between us and the Holocaust, society must seek solutions to the consequences of time in order to maintain a living and visceral connection to it, ensuring its enduring impact. This practicum project examines how the medium of the museum can be formulated to halt the descent of memory into history. Utilizing a combination of traditional Jewish mourning, healing and remembrance practices; memory theories and the architectural and spatial connections to memory, this project establishes how memories can be triggered, created and maintained through exhibition space. My research and following conclusions are informed by theorists including Alison Landsberg, Juhani Pallasmaa, Daniel Libeskind, Stephan Jaeger, David Dernie and Graeme Brooker. The combination and application of these theorists develop a case for an experiential museum space that utilizes specific and personal narratives to educate and connect visitors to the Holocaust, providing a means to continue its memory through the spatialization of memory theories. Some of the key theories that inform these decisions are that of prosthetic memory production through space; the implementation of mise-en-scene elements to enable strong sensory engagement and emotional affect; and the use of fragments and reflective space enabling visitors to embed and develop their own understanding of the exhibition’s narrative. These theories are implemented through elements including lighting, architectural form, transmedia, circulation, experientiality, narrative and exhibition tactics. The combination of research methods including a literary analysis, site and building analysis, precedent studies of relevant architectural projects and program analysis combine to inform the design proposal for the adaptive reuse of the Vancouver Unitarian Church. The use of an existing building and implementation of adaptive reuse practices further add to the palimpsest of memory engrained in this project, acting as a critical driver. The combination of the listed elements and theories creates a memorial museum that maintains the active memory of the Holocaust, promoting its continuing relevance and effect on society to this day, while also assuaging the pain associated with it.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.641
Threshold uncertainty score0.961

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it