Сучасні трансформації історичної пам’яті польського та українського суспільств щодо міжетнічного конфлікту на Волині 1943–1944 років
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Стаття присвячена впливу історичної пам'яті українського та польського суспільств на сучасні міждержавні відносини сусідніх країн. Судячи з історії двосторонніх відносин між Україною та Польщею, що склалася через чверть століття, міжнародні конфлікти минулого, негативні соціальні та історичні стереотипи, незгода складних сторінок загальної історії можуть суттєво вплинути на міжнародні відносини і, як результат гуманітарної сфери держави. Сучасні трансформації історичної пам'яті польських і українських суспільств свідчать про тенденцію до загострення міжетнічних протиріч. The article focuses on the influence of the historical memory of the ukrainian and polish societies on the modern interstate relations of the neighbouring countries. Judging by the quarter century long history of the bilateral relations between Ukraine and Poland international conflicts of the past, negative social and historical stereotypes, non-agreement of the difficult pages of the common history can significantly influence on the international relations and as a result on the humanitarian sphere of the state. Modern transformations of the historical memory of Polish and Ukrainian societies show a tendency to exacerbate interethnic contradictions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".