รปแบบการมสวนรวมของมสยดในการสงเสรมสขภาพ จงหวดปตตาน
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This descriptive research aimed to study The objective was to study the situation of development of health promoting masjid and Masjid participation model for health promotion of Pattani Province.The study used mixed method comprising quantitative by analyzing reports from 650 developing Masjids for health promotion in Pattani Province which were studied qualitative data collection by focus group discussion with 15 representatives of Masjid committees from those Masjids and folkway health education Masjids who had passed the religious health promotion standard with excellent level, as well as 20 persons who were stakeholders from government and private agencies.The study was conducted following the 5 major strategies of the Ottawa charter for health promotion as follows: 1) community participation in healthy public policy such as setting up smoke free Masjids; 2) creating supportive environment such as improving sanitation in Masjids; 3) strengthening community actions such as arranging cultural activities to support team harmony at community level, and encouraging representatives of every part to the community to attend the activities continually; 4) developing personal skills such by educating villagers on environmental health, arranging health activities related to local health problems, and presenting personal health care education to villagers by religious leaders;, and 5) reorienting health services such as encouraging villagers to be aware that everyone is responsible for personal health, emphasizing prevention more than treatment.The Masjid was set as a folkway health education center in maternal and child health, chronic infectious diseases, hajj, tobacco and krathom use, convincing people to stop risk behaviors, as well as creating activities for health promotion with community participationThe Masjid participation model for health promotion.can be applied in other areas.to remedy problems in accordance with the way of life and culture and to contribute to good personal and community
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".