MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7054282372

Akciğer kanserli hastaların torakotomi sonrası dönemde ağrı algıları ile anksiyeteleri arasındaki ilişki

2010· other· tr· W7054282372 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMarmara University Open Access System · 2010
Typeother
Languagetr
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser Design and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSignificant differenceMann–Whitney U testMean differenceQuality of Life Research
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Akciğer Kanserli Hastaların Torakotomi Sonrası Dönemde Ağrı Algıları İle Anksiyeteleri Arasındaki İlişki\n\nAraştırma, akciğer kanserli hastaların torakotomi sonrası dönemde ağrı algıları ile anksiyeteleri arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemek için tanımlayıcı olarak yapıldı.\n \tAraştırma, Sağlık Bakanlığına bağlı bir Göğüs Hastalıkları ve Göğüs Cerrahisi Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesinde postop yoğun bakım ünitesinde akciğer kanseri tanısı konmuş torakotomi olan 100 hasta ile yapıldı. Veri toplama aracı olarak araştırmacı tarafından hazırlanan bireysel özellikler formu ve hastalığa ilişkin özellikleri içeren genel bilgi formu, hastaların ağrı düzeylerini ölçmek için Mcgill-Melzack Ağrı Soru Formu, hastaların postop 0. gün ve 3. gün anksiyetelerini belirlemek için Beck Anksiyete Ölçeği kullanıldı. Verilerin analizinde Kruskal Wallis, Mann Whitney u, ki-kare testleri, korelasyon analizinde ise Pearson yöntemi kullanıldı. \n\tAraştırmaya katılan bireylerin %68’inin derin, %32’sinin yüzeyel ağrısı olduğu saptandı. Hastaların ağrılarını belirleyen kelimelere baktığımızda duyusal boyutta; %26’sı çok keskin, %21’i acıtıcı, %28’i keskin, algısal boyutta; %6’sı şiddetli, %4’ü dayanılmaz, değerlendirmede; %27’si sıkıntılı, diğer bölümde ise %40’ı rahatsız eden olarak ifade ettikleri bulundu. Hastaların postop 0. gün anksiyete puanı arttıkça şu anki ağrı şiddetinin de arttığı ( r=0,20 p<0.05); postop 0. gün anksiyete puanı arttıkça hastaların ağrının en kötü olduğu zamanki ağrı şiddetinin de artmış olduğu ( r=0,31 p<0.05); hastaların postop 3. gün anksiyete puanı arttıkça şu anki ağrı şiddetinin de artmış olduğu bulundu ( r=0,20 p<0.05). Torakotomi olan hastaların ağrılarının derinde olduğunu ve ağrılarını benzer kelimeler ile ifade ettiklerini; ağrı ve anksiyetenin birbirleri ile ilişkisi olduğunu söyleyebiliriz. Çalışma bulgularına dayanarak hastaların ağrılarını ifade etmelerine izin verilmesi gerektiği ve ağrı arttıkça anksiyete de arttığı için öncelikle hastaların ağrılarını azaltacak uygun yöntemlerin kullanılmasına önem verilmesi gerektiği söylenebilir.\n\nAnahtar kelimeler: Beck Anksiyete Ölçeği(BAE), Mcgill-Melzack Ağrı Soru Formu(MASF), Kanser, Postoperatif Ağrı, Torakotomi.\n\nSUMMARY\n\nCorelation Between Anxiety And Pain Perceptions Of Patient With Lung Cancer In Post-Thoracotomy Period\n\nResearch was performed interpretively in order to examine correlation between anxiety and pain perceptions of patient with lung cancer in post-thoracotomy period.\nResearch was performed to 100 patients with lung cancer diagnosed in post-up intensive care unit of Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training and Research Hospital. It was benefited from Personal Characteristics Form prepared, as data collection tool, by researcher and General Information Form consisting of details related to the disease, Mcgill-Melzack Pain Questionnaire Form to evaluate pain levels of patients and Beck anxiety scale to evaluate conditions and continuous anxieties. İn analyzing data. Kruskal Wallis, Mann Whitney u, chi-square tests in comparison process and Pearson method in correlation analyze were used. \nIt was determined that 68 % of attendants have extensive pain and 32 % of them have superficial pain. If we take a look at expressions mentioning patient’s pain, it was expressed in emotional extent by 26 % of them as too severely, 21 % of them as painful and 28 % of them as severely. It was expressed in perceptual extent by 6 % of them as intense, 4 % of them as unbearable; 27 % of them as anxious 40 % of them as uneasy. It was observed that as long as situational anxiety point of patient increases, the pain level increases( r=0,20 p<0.05), as situational anxiety point of patient increases, the pain level at the worst period increases too ( r=0,31 p<0.05); as continuous anxiety point of patient increases, current pain level also increases (r=0,20 p<0.05). We may claim that their pain is extensive as they had a thoracotomy operation and the patients make similar expressions for their pain level; there is a relationship between pain and anxiety. Based upon the research findings, it can be claimed that the patients need to be allowed to express their pain and appropriate method applications that will relieve the pain of patients are to be taken into consideration because of the fact that as pain increases anxiety increases.\n\n Keys Words: Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), McGill Melzack Pain Questionnaire (MASF), Cancer, Postoperatif Pain, Thoracotomy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMarmara University Open Access SystemSame topicLaser Design and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207