Adjunctive drug therapy for treatment of experimental hydrocephalus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We nvestigated two drugs, nimodipine and AXOKINE(R), and their effect on functional outcome in an infant rat model of experimental hydrocephalus. Hydrocephalus was achieved by injecting kaolin into the cisterna magna of three-week-old rats. Hydrocephalus was allowed to develop for two weeks prior to beginning treatment with nimodipine subcutaneously (1.8 mg per day) for 14 days at which time the rats were killed. The rats in this group were not surgically treated with shunting. In a separate experiment hydrocephalus was allowed to progress for three weeks. The rats were then shunted and intraventricular administration of a second generation ciliary neurotrophic factor, AXOKINE (R) at either a low dose (1.4 [mu]g/day) or high dose (14.3 [mu]g/day) was started. Functional assessment consisted of motor, memory and learning components. Motor function was tested using spontaneous activity counting, ability to stay on a rotating drum, and swimming. Memory and learning were quantitatively monitored using a modified Morris water maze. Histological examination provided pathological correlates to the functional outcome. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".