THE ACADEMIC BONIFACE ASSOCIATION IN BRANIEWO IN THE SECOND HALF OF THE 19TH CENTURY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Academic Boniface Association in Braniewo (Akademischer Bonifatiusverein) was founded on 25 October 1887 on the initiative of Bernhard Oestreich. At that time, 28 students of the Seminary in Braniewo joined it. The purpose of the organization was to fulfil the spiritual and financial needs of Catholics living in diaspora. Rev. Prof. Franz Dittrich became a protector of the association, starting from the winter term of 1887-1888. The lecturers of the Lyceum Hosianum and animators of the Seminary were usually honorary members of the organization. Any student of the Seminary could be an ordinary member, and any graduate could be an extraordinary member. The funds for the statutory objectives of the association were obtained by collecting membership fees as well as from extraordinary revenues (selling stamps and beer, donations for theatre performances, concerts etc.). Thanks to them, academic centres in Halle, Kiel, Berlin etc. were supported. In 1888 it was decided that one third of the collected financial resources of the Braniewo association would be transferred to the pastoral institutions of the Bishopric of Warmia. Since then, Święta Siekierka, Górowo Iławeckie, Kętrzyn, Ełk and Gołdap have been among its beneficiaries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".