Aniquilar la Ilustración o el canon cristiano de la lectura en el siglo XVIII
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work studies the theory of reading and the proposal of literary interpretation put forward, as a complement to institutional censorship, by part of the clergy in the last quarter of the 18th century. Based on the analysis of a paradigmatic French text by Nicolas Jamin, the <i>Treatise on Christian Reading</i> (1774) and its translation into Spanish (1784), we analyse the will to establish a reading methodology with a counter-enlightened approach among the faithful and, by extension, in the society of believers. This methodology is based on theorizing about the text from the acceptance and spreading of a set of dogmatic and religious principles which will be used to assess the utilitarian meaning of reading, to ascribe civil and social responsibility to readers, and to establish criteria of bibliographic selection which would, in practice, make it impossible to gain access to the thinking of French enlightened philosophers. This work advances the thesis of the creation of a hermeneutic circle promoted by the official authorities on censorship that reaches its climax when the Christian reader is trained to accept that the only universal critical judgment is the revealed truth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it