MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7054663230

¿Al fondo del escalafón? Un estado de la cuestión sobre el trabajo doméstico remunerado en el Perú

2015· dissertation· es· W7054663230 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueRedalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languagees
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Frequency and Time Standards
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)State (computer science)Work (physics)Order (exchange)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El sector de trabajadoras domésticas remuneradas ha enfrentado una discriminación histórica desproporcionada que pareciera estar relacionada con su particular composición sociodemográfica: mujeres jóvenes, de bajos recursos, bajo nivel educativo, provenientes de grupos étnicos marginados, trabajando en un 92.4% de los casos en condiciones de informalidad (INEI 2013). Además, a diferencia de otros trabajos, éste se realiza dentro de una residencia privada, donde resulta difícil que el Estado pueda regular y hacer cumplir los derechos y obligaciones establecidos por ley.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.139

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRedalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México)Same topicAdvanced Frequency and Time StandardsFrench-language works237,207