Balancing Economic Growth and Environmental Conservation: The Dixie Valley Geothermal Plant and the Endangered Dixie Toad
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This report will look at the Dixie Valley Nevada geothermal plant and how it impacts the Dixie toad, the surrounding environment, local community members, and the local indigenous tribes in the area. Ormat, a Canadian mining company, has proposed significant economic and development growth at one of Nevada's hottest geothermal sources in Dixie Valley. We will look at socioeconomic factors such as where the geothermal site is located compared to indigenous land and local towns and communities. We will also examine local government, private sectors, and local organizations and their responses to the Ormat's plan to open the Geothermal site. Other environmental aspects discussed in the paper will be public and private land and the environmental impact statement from Nepa documents produced by the Bureau of Land Management. I will incorporate how the geothermal plant has impacted the ecosystems and landscapes of the Dixie Valley toad. The Timbisha Shoshone and Southern Paiute Tribes and the Center for Biological Diversity have filed a lawsuit against Ormat due to the risks posed by sustainable development and the Dixie Valley toad. Lastly, our research will look at the economic and working opportunities for people working at the Geothermal site and how this may influence policy decision making.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".