Architettura pubblica a Cirene nel III secolo a.C.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Since the last quarter of the fourth century BC, after the fall of Cyrene under the Ptolemies’ influence, the direct contact with the Alexandrine world paved the way for a new era in the history of cyrenaican architecture. In this respect, the third century BC was crucial in that it laid the foundations of the Cyrene’s urban and architectonic development until Romanization. The agora was enlarged northwards owing to the construction of new stoai, such as the Portico B5 and the Portico O2, in which the combination between Doric and Ionian order was applied for the first time. New public structures were built, such as the Nomophylakeion, the Archeion and the Prytaneion; furthermore, the main urban and extramural sanctuary of the colony grew and significantly developed. An architecture and sculpture school appeared, under which several monumental and decorative innovations refreshed the city plan between the third and the beginning of the second century BC, unquestionably the richest and the most fruitful period of the urban and monumental development of the colony, to such an extent that it was called the “High Cyrenean Period”.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".