MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7054720913

Análisis de la posibilidad de que el Colegio de Psicólogos de Madrid ceda al Instituto Madrileño del Menor y la Familia (IMMF), un listado de las familias atendidas por el Turno de Adopciones Internacionales cuyos informes hayan sido visados, y, si las hubiera, de las incidencias producidas

2011· article· es· W7054720913 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueHispana · 2011
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldMedicine
TopicPeptidase Inhibition and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDuration (music)Quarter (Canadian coin)Training (meteorology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Corresponde a las Entidades Públicas competentes en materia de protección de menores la declaración de idoneidad de los adoptantes a través de los informes de idoneidad, que estarán sujetos a las condiciones, requisitos y limitaciones establecidos en la legislación correspondiente

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHispanaSame topicPeptidase Inhibition and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207