MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7054720913

Análisis de la posibilidad de que el Colegio de Psicólogos de Madrid ceda al Instituto Madrileño del Menor y la Familia (IMMF), un listado de las familias atendidas por el Turno de Adopciones Internacionales cuyos informes hayan sido visados, y, si las hubiera, de las incidencias producidas

2011· article· es· W7054720913 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueHispana · 2011
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldMedicine
TopicPeptidase Inhibition and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDuration (music)Quarter (Canadian coin)Training (meteorology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Corresponde a las Entidades Públicas competentes en materia de protección de menores la declaración de idoneidad de los adoptantes a través de los informes de idoneidad, que estarán sujetos a las condiciones, requisitos y limitaciones establecidos en la legislación correspondiente

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHispanaSame topicPeptidase Inhibition and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207