MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7054744258

Assessment of Metamorphic Grade on Arsenic in Metapelites in Vermont: Potential Implications for Bedrock Aquifers

2012· article· en· W7054744258 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser Design and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSLATESMetamorphic rockMetamorphismUltramafic rockLithificationPhylliteBedrockAuthigenicArsenopyriteLithology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In northern New England and southern Quebec, elevated naturally-occurring As levels have been reported in bedrock wells completed in slates of the Taconic Allochthons (VT) and Central Maine Belt (ME), ultramafic rocks of the Rowe-Hawley Belt (VT), contact zones for granitic intrusions (NH and ME), and low grade metasedimentary rocks of the Connecticut Valley Trough (CVT) in Quebec. The most common lithologic sources of arsenic in Vermont bedrock aquifers are 1) authigenic pyrite which initially formed in geochemically-reduced marine sediments that have been lithified into shales or chlorite grade slates and 2) serpentine-group minerals in ultramafics. Through the plate tectonic cycle, marine shales may either be subducted or thrust onto a continental margin during orogenesis; in either case, the As may initially be mobilized via fluid during metamorphism and then resequestered (i.e. in ultramafics). Through the detailed geochemical analysis of rocks of different metamorphic grades in the Taconic Allochthons and CVT, this study assesses the role that metamorphism plays in As mobility. Low-grade slates (chlorite-illite) of the Giddings Brook slice in the Taconic Allochthons contain an average of 43.4 mg/kg As and 33 % of bedrock wells contain > 10 ppb As; by contrast, higher grade slates and phyllites (paragonite-chlorite-muscovite) of the Bird Mountain slice contain an average of 3.2 mg/kg As and only 4 % of wells contain > 10 ppb As. In the Rowe Hawley belt, biotite grade metapelites contain low concentrations of As (7 mg/kg) whereas ultramafics within the same belt have elevated As levels (93 mg/kg), suggesting that As was transferred from metapelites to ultramafics during subduction zone metamorphism and serpentinization. Thus, based on these results, this study hypothesizes that for two pelitic rocks of initially equal arsenic concentration, the rock exposed to the greater degree of metamorphism will have a lower arsenic concentration. The particular focus of this thesis is the Connecticut Valley Sequence in northeastern Vermont. Data generated in this project is integrated with other Vermont datasets to develop a dataset encompassing many metapelites over a wide range of metamorphic grade by comparing REE values with those of the North American Shale Composite. Existing data from biotite grade rocks of the CVT in Vermont indicate average arsenic concentration of 7 mg/kg; chlorite zone rocks from the Taconics contain 44 ppm As, whereas garnet and staurolite zone lithologies contain no detectable As. These data are compelling evidence for the influence of of prograde metamorphism on As in metapelites.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.884
Threshold uncertainty score0.233

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicLaser Design and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207