Agbiotech Bulletin, Volume 3, Issue 4, April, 1995
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Agbiotech Bulletin Volume 3, Issue 4, April, 1995 Code Number: NL95019\nSize of Files: Text: 48.3K No associated graphics files First\nTransgenic Crops Near Approval Developing a Track Record Powerful\nTechnology Pioneer Fails to Have WCC/RRC Rules Set Aside Regulatory\nImplications International Progress News Cargill to Build Canola\nCrushing Plant Near Saskatoon Ag Canada Restructuring Engineered Tomato\nApproved for Canadian Markets Beetles as hornfly controls Priority\nSubstances List Panel Formed Resistance to Net Blotch Disease in Barley\nDetecting Bacterial Blight in Beans National Round Table Announced\nEvents Symposium on GLA, May 9-10, 1995 Ninth Annual Bio Meeting, May\n20-25, 1995 Genes for the Future, May 24-27, 1995 Trends Pioneer Moving\nto ISO 9000 Standards Natural Antibiotic for Potato Scab Alliances\nCargill Acquires InterMountain Canola Proprietary Seed Grower Sold Crop\nGenetics Purchased by Biosys EcoScience Seeks Help to Back-Off Alliance\nin Animal Feed Technology Transfer Ag Canada Offers Business\nOpportunities Biological Control of Root Rot Microbial Degradation of\nHerbicides Finance New Directions for Western Economic Diversification\nAmerican Firms Scrambling to Retain Biotech Leadership Profit Advantage\nwith Tomato Poplar Trees to Be Improved for Fuel Use Mexican Company\nExpands Into Agbiotech Calgene Reports Another Loss Mycogen Reports\nProfit Issues Shake-Up of Pesticide Regulation Favours Alternatives\nIBAC Backs Efficiency Act Pesticide Use Replaced with Cultural,\nBiological Controls Attitudes Optima Study on Consumer Interest in\nBiotech Available Resources First Anniversary of rbST Use Marked\nCanada-Sask Centre Offers Fast Business Information Alberta's Summer\nAgricultural Education Institute New Partnering Initiative Centre Links\nCanadian Business with South East Asia Canada, Indonesia Linked by New\nBusiness Office Electronic Atlas on Biodiversity International Business\nInfo Available on Electronic Bulletin Board Canadian Genetic Research\nProfiled People Watch Staff Appointments at PSCI IWSS Elects New\nPresident Biovail Appoints New President
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.555 | 0.603 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".