MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7054793314

Borders and constructivist regional geographies: Cross-border cooperation addressing challenges to alternative cohesion policies

2016· article· en· W7054793314 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronic Archive of the Institute for Regional Studies, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies (ELEKTRA) (Centre for Economic and Regional Studies) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Frequency and Time Standards
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEuropean University AssociationRegione MoliseAgence Universitaire de la FrancophonieSemmelweis EgyetemEötvös Loránd TudományegyetemVrije Universiteit BrusselUniversité de LilleH2020 European Research CouncilUniversità degli Studi di Cagliari
KeywordsCohesion (chemistry)Momentum (technical analysis)EmigrationPublic fundingResearch programSocial constructivism
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MTA establishes and maintains research institutes in the fields of the natural and social sciences.It also operates such other institutions of learning as libraries, archives, systems of information, etc. as well as it subsidises research groups operating at universities and public collections.Currently, there are 47 research institutes (including 10 Research Centres) run by MTA. MOMENTUM PROGRAMThe objective of the Momentum Program is a dynamic renewal of the research teams of the Academy and participating universities via attracting outstanding young researchers back to Hungary.The impact and success of this application model is highly acclaimed and recognised even by the international scientific community.Initiated by former MTA President Jzsef Plinks, the Momentum program aims to halt the emigration of young researchers, provides a new supply of talented researchers, extends career possibilities, and increases the competitiveness of MTA's research institutes and participating universities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.761
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectronic Archive of the Institute for Regional Studies, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies (ELEKTRA) (Centre for Economic and Regional Studies)Same topicAdvanced Frequency and Time StandardsFrench-language works237,207