Australia-Taiwan First Nations Art Exchange 2023 - Short Documentary
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This short documentary is based on a pilot project - when four Indigenous artists visited Taiwan and Australia for 10 days in June and July 2023 to undertake field research, led by Dr. Sophie McIntyre and Dr. Fang Chun-wei. It was the first time most of these artists had travelled to Taiwan and Australia, and it was also the first time they met other project participants face-to-face.<br/> <br/>During these initial visits, each artist delivered introductory talks and workshops in Taipei and Taitung focusing on their art practices. They also visited artist studios, galleries, museums and met with curators, communities and government officials.<br/> <br/>These four artists were also involved in Stages 1 and 2 of this ongoing Australia-Taiwan First Nations Art Exchange project which comprises an international symposium (2021, https://research.qut.edu.au/cpfsi/events/grounded-in-place-symposium/) and publication (Pacific Arts, UCLA, 2022, https://escholarship.org/uc/item/73k4s2c9). These field trips were funded by the Ministry of Culture Taiwan.<br/> <br/>This short video draws on archival footage taken during these visits, mostly by Baunay Watan, an amateur filmmaker and husband of Atayal artist Yuma Taru, and interviews filmed in Australia after the pilot project had concluded by Dr Phoebe Hart.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".