The Benefits of Circus Arts Practice and Performance on Adolescent Wellbeing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT \nThe Benefits of Circus Arts Practice and Performance on Adolescent Wellbeing \nMélanie-Beby Robert \n \nAs the circus arts continue to evolve in Quebec rapidly, there is an increasing interest in exploring this domain, particularly regarding its influence on child development. This study aims to understand how circus arts performances affect the wellbeing of adolescents. In this qualitative research, ten adolescents taking classes at the École de Cirque de Verdun were observed with a view to better understand their wellbeing through circus practice and performance. The data collection methods include observations, curated journals, and interviews. The study's findings encompass the participants’ definitions of wellbeing, the importance of healthy relationships, and the significance of having strong role models in their lives during adolescence. The results offer insights into how their circus rehearsal influences their wellbeing. These findings highlight that artistic expression, physical abilities, and personal growth collectively contribute to the comprehensive development of young individuals during this crucial life phase. \n \nKeywords: Circus education, adolescence, wellbeing, play, risk, socializing, circus performance, child development, Quebec circus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".