MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7054933159

Canadian Snow Radar Satellite Mission Science Readiness Advancements

2023· other· en· W7054933159 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venueelib (German Aerospace Center) · 2023
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSnowRadarSatelliteSnowpackContext (archaeology)Sampling (signal processing)Climate change
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) and the Canadian Space Agency (CSA) continue to advance a new satellite Ku-band radar mission focused on providing moderate resolution (500 m) information on seasonal snow mass. Like many regions of the northern hemisphere, estimates of the amount of water stored as seasonal snow are highly uncertain across Canada. To address this gap, a technical concept capable of providing dual-polarization (VV/VH), moderate resolution (500 m), wide swath (~250 km), and high duty cycle (~25% SAR-on time) Ku-band radar measurements at two frequencies (13.5; 17.25 GHz) is under development. In this presentation, results from the Trail Valley Creek experiment (TVCEx) conducted in winter of 2018-19 will be presented. Data collected during the CryoSAR 2022-23 campaign in Powassan, Ontario, Canada will also be shown in the context of how the proposed snow radar mission can improve SWE retrievals in agricultural lands. Using the UMASS airborne Ku-band radar instrument and satellite observations from RADARSAT-2 and TerraSAR-X, we show that it is possible to retrieve background soil properties allowing to separate the background from the snowpack contribution of the Ku-band signal and isolate the snow volume scattering to facilitate radar-based SWE retrievals. We also show that the ground-based snow sampling strategy deployed during the TVCEx, providing statistical distributions of snow microstructure and density, is crucial to properly estimate the radar signal from forward modelling. Ground-based snow properties, soil and weather station information, drone LiDAR/optical data and radar observations collected for the CryoSAR campaign will also be presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.103
Threshold uncertainty score0.208

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueelib (German Aerospace Center)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207