MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7054993157

Beyond Theresienstadt: illuminating the late piano sonatas of Viktor Ullmann

2020· dissertation· en· W7054993157 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser Design and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsTonalityPianoPiano sonataMusicalRelevance (law)Period (music)Value (mathematics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

De son temps Viktor Ullmann (1898-1944) était un compositeur qui avait du succès et était bien établi, mais il reste largement inconnu. Autrichien d’origine juive, il a été réduit au silence à la suite de son incarcération dans le camp de transit et ghetto à Terezín, et de sa mort ultérieure à Auschwitz. Écrites pendant sa détention, les sonates numéro 5, 6 et 7 pour piano illustrent son langage musical - une intégration particulière de tonalité et d’atonalité dotée des éléments de tradition et de modernité. Sa formation avait été étroitement associée à Arnold Schoenberg et à la deuxième école viennoise, mais pour sa musique Ullmann s’est éloigné consciemment d’une absence totale de tonalité. Cette thèse servira à mettre en lumière la valeur et la pertinence des sonates tardives pour piano d’Ullmann, des oeuvres uniques qui devraient apporter des ajouts intéressants au paysage du répertoire pour piano solo du XXe siècle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicLaser Design and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207