Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law of Canada, 4th ed.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law of Canada, Fourth Edition is a comprehensive four-volume looseleaf supplemented book that provides detailed annotation of the entire Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and Rules. This long-standing work is recognized as one of the major sources for serious research in bankruptcy law in Canada. Find detailed and updated annotation and commentary on: Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and Rules Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act Farm Debt Mediation Act Wage Earner Protection Program Act The section-by-section and rule-by-rule case annotations and commentary provide an exhaustive and detailed resource tool for insolvency lawyers, trustees, receivers, and liquidators. The collection of policy documents, model orders, forms, and precedents provide additional practice guides to make it the most complete resource for the professional. This revised edition includes a completely new, easier-to-use table of contents and index along with an update to the commentary annotating the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act – Part I (Compromises and Arrangements). [From Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law of Canada, 4th Edition | Thomson Reuters]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.035 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".