MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7055073604

Beyond <i>What?</i> Beyond <i>Earth Orbit?</i> . . . ! The Applicability of the Registration Convention to Private Commercial Manned <i>Sub-Orbital</i> Spaceflight

2013· article· en· W7055073604 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInsecta mundi · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser Design and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConventionSpaceflightHuman spaceflightContext (archaeology)Space (punctuation)International Space Station
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I. Space Tourism: Where Are We Going and What Is Taking Us There? ... A. Space Tourism as the Newest Kid on the Block ... B. Conducting Sub-Orbital Operations with Aircraft or Space Objects ... C. Manned Sub-Orbital Spaceflight and the Requirement of Proper International Registration\nII. Registration: As Aircraft or as Space Object? ... A. International, European, and U.S. Approaches to Regulating Sub-Orbital Spaceflight ... B. Applying the Registration Convention to Private Commercial Manned Spaceflight ... C. The Core Problem with Application of the Registration Convention to Sub-Orbital Flights\nIII. Back to Semantics: The Definitions of Beyond, Earth Orbit, and Sub(-Orbital) ... A. The Meanings of Beyond and Earth Orbit as Employed by the Registration Convention ... B. The Meanings of Sub and Sub-orbital Flight ... C. Conclusion: Confusion?\nIV. Context, Object, and Purpose of the Registration Convention ... A. The Context within Which the Registration Convention Arose ... B. The Main Objective and Purposes of the Registration Convention\nV. The Practice in Implementing the Registration Convention ... A. United States Practice ... B. The Practice of Other States with a National Space Law ... C. Preliminary Conclusions Regarding Implementation Practice\nVI. Preparatory Works and Circumstances Surrounding Conclusion of the Convention ... A. The Travaux Préparatoires of the Registration Convention ... B. The French and Canadian Drafts: “into Space” ... C. The U.S. Draft: “into Earth Orbit or Beyond” ... D. Preliminary Conclusions Regarding the Preparatory Works\nVII. Taking Stock: The Remaining Conundrums ... A. The Proper Definition of Sub-Orbital Objects (and Flights) ... B. The Proper Interpretation of “into Earth Orbit or Beyond” ... C. Conclusion: The Proper Scope of the Registration Convention\nVIII. Revisiting an Old Acquaintance: The Issue of Delimitation of Outer Space ... A. Relating “into Earth Orbit or Beyond” to “in Outer Space” ... B. Defining “Earth Orbit or Beyond” as a “Precise” Geographic Concept ... C. Convergence on 100 Kilometers as the Lower Boundary for Applying the Registration Convention\nIX. Applying the Registration Convention to Manned Suborbital Spaceflight ... A. The Difference between Private Manned Commercial and Other Sub-Orbital Spaceflight ... B. Towards a Proper “Space Traffic Management” System under the Registration Convention ... C. The U.S. Example of Handling Private Commercial Sub-Orbital Spaceflights\nX. Concluding Remarks

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.775
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it