Canada Goose Harvest and Hunter Activity in the Southern Illinois Quota Zone during the \n 1976 Season
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During the 1976 Canada goose season in the southern Illinois quota zone, hunters made 44,080 trips to harvest 25,865 geese for a success rate of 0.59.The mean number of hunters per day was 1,633.Hunter success was consistently good throughout the 27-day season.Public hunting areas accounted for 25 percent of the total hunting effort, 16 percent of the harvest, and had a success rate of 0.38.Alexander county recorded 35 percent of the total hunting effort, 30 percent of the harvest, and had a success rate of 0.49.Union county had 22 percent of the hunter-trips, 23 percent of the harvest, and a success of 0.62.Williamson/Jackson counties took 43 percent of the trips and accounted for 47 percent of the harvest; success in these counties was 0.65.The population in the quota zone peaked lake in the season when an all-time high of 316,000 geese was recorded on December 14th.Age ratios among harvested geese were lower than in 1975, with 2.5 immatures per adult at Horseshoe Lake and 2.7 immatures per adult at Union County.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".