MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7055137560

Characterizing phenotypic diversity in marine populations of threespine sticklebacks

2021· dissertation· en· W7055137560 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGasterosteusSticklebackHabitatFish migrationMarine habitatsSexual dimorphismSouthern HemisphereTrait
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) is an important model for studying evolution. Sticklebacks are widely distributed in the northern hemisphere and inhabit freshwater, brackish, and marine waters. Anadromous and marine populations (hereafter marine) are assumed to be homogenous in space and invariant in time in their phenotypic characteristics, despite marine environments varying on regional and local scales. Recent studies suggest there is in fact genetic and phenotypic structure in marine sticklebacks, yet the ecological causes remain unclear. My goal was to assess trait variation in marine stickleback populations around Southern coastal British Columbia (BC), and to determine whether or not oceanographic and habitat characteristics explained this variation. The area around Vancouver Island was ideal because four distinct oceanographic regions surround the island with varying coastal habitat types. Between May-July 2019, I sampled ~600 sticklebacks from 15 sites. I then characterized trait variation using two-dimensional (2D) geometric morphometric analysis to compare individuals between oceanographic regions and coastal habitats. I focused on five traits: armour phenotype, head size, body size, head shape, and body shape. I chose these traits because they are ecologically important and well-studied in freshwater populations, where their ecological drivers are known. I found that marine sticklebacks did vary morphologically among and between regions and habitats, but the variation was not immediately related to environmental variation, nor obviously comparable to variation in freshwater populations. Sexual dimorphism was the largest source of variation in the data, a well-established finding. But oceanographic and habitat variables influenced differences between males and females. I concluded that marine sticklebacks offer abundant opportunities for expanding our knowledge of drivers of morphology in nature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207