Biomechanical modelling and animating human hand movements
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A different technique for animating human movement is presented and applied to \nanimating the movement of the fingers and thumb. This paper presents the technique of \nmuscle control -- simulating the effects of the tendons and muscles that affect movement \nof the body. The hand model created for simulating the movement of the fingers and \nthumb includes "puppet strings" that behave similarly to their original counterparts -- the \nmotor muscles and tendons found in the hand. \nIn applying the new approach of muscle control movement, the hand was easier to manipulate and animate. In graphics, the simulation of movement is part of a larger project to simulate living creatures,including humans. The technique presented in this paper produced results for the animation of the fingers and thumb. Since the hand, \nwhich is an intricate part of the body, can be animated using this technique then in \ntheory, it can be applied to the entire body. Thus, the goal of the research was proven to be a step in the right direction of animating human motion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.090 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".