MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7055229721

Characterization of electronically active defects in hafnium dioxide high-[kappa] gate dielectrics

2006· dissertation· en· W7055229721 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2006
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMagnetic Field Sensors Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRelative permittivityPermittivityDielectricGate dielectricCapacitorSilicon dioxideHigh-κ dielectricSilicon
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The trapping behaviour of electronic defects in high-r, HfO2, metal-oxide- semiconductor (MOS) capacitors was investigated using capacitance-voltage and photocurrent-voltage (photo IV) measurements.The tested capacitors had a semi- transparent aluminum gate, HfO2 deposited by metal-organic chemical vapour deposition, a SiO* intermediate layer, and a lightly doped (1x101s cm-3) p-type silicon substrate.Internal photoemission was used to inject electrons from the gate and substrate electrodes for the charge injection study.The centroid of the oxide trapped charge was extracted from photo IV measurements, which conf,rmed that electrons are readily trapped by and detrapped from a large densþ of pre-existing defects (> 1012 cm-3; in the bulk HfOz layer.The effective density of trapped charge was highly dependent on stress voltage and was modeled using first-order trapping kinetics with two defects having different capture cross-sections.The results from this work validate the use of the photo IV technique for high-r MOS characterization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.168
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)Same topicMagnetic Field Sensors TechniquesFrench-language works237,207