MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7055258227

Canadian imperialism into the twenty-first century: capitalism, sovereignty and the challenges of multipolarity

2023· dissertation· en· W7055258227 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicThermal properties of materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeoliberalism (international relations)SovereigntyIdeologyForeign policyNationalismDoctrineHegemonyInternational relationsInternational law
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis argues that in the post-Cold War period, Canadian foreign policy has pursued neoliberal transformation around the world while undermining international norms of sovereignty, with the overriding goal of facilitating the international expansion of Canadian capital. Despite considerable success, this project is being undermined by the forces driving the emergence of a multipolar world. This thesis begins by critically engaging left nationalist accounts of Canadian capitalism’s development in the post-Confederation period, as well as their critics. While the former seemed to discount imperialism within and beyond Canada’s borders as a foundation of Canadian capitalism, their critics’ conception of Canada’s relationship with imperialism also suffers from some important weaknesses. Against this theoretical backdrop, this thesis analyzes the class forces driving Canada’s transition to continental neoliberalism in the wake of the crises of the 1970s and reconsiders its implications for Canadian sovereignty in light of Canada’s shift toward negotiating modern treaties with Indigenous peoples. In the post-Cold War period, the thesis argues that Canada foreign policy became increasingly dedicated to facilitating the international expansion of Canadian capital through the pursuit of neoliberal transformation around the world. The driving forces of this shift and some of the concrete changes in Canadian foreign policy are examined. Next, the thesis looks at Canada’s leading role in developing the ideology of and normalizing the practice of humanitarian intervention, with reference to the Responsibility to Protect doctrine and its application in the 2004 coup d’état in Haiti. The thesis ends by considers the challenges facing Canada’s imperialist project of aggressively pursuing neoliberal transformation around the world by analyzing the contradictions of Canada’s bilateral relations with the People’s Republic of China.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.144
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0300.037
Scholarly communication0.0130.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)→Same topicThermal properties of materials→French-language works237,207→