MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7055265535

Censura e istituzioni culturali in Urss: Dall'Ottobre alla risoluzione del 1925

2016· article· it· W7055265535 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronic Theses and Dissertations Repository (University of Pisa) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser Design and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Oxford
KeywordsNucleofectionGestational periodTSG101HyporeflexiaLiquationDysgeusia
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Scopo precipuo della presente tesi è quello di dare al lettore una panoramica esauriente sul sistema della censura in epoca sovietica, dal 1917 al 1925. L'analisi di tale periodo sarà preceduta da una breve storia della censura dai tempi di Pietro il Grande all'Ottobre. Saranno inoltre studiati a fondo quegli organi statali che più degli altri si occuparono di cultura, come il Commissariato dell'istruzione. Sarà inoltre dato spazio alle diatribe in campo culturale dei vari gruppi e gruppuscoli artistici che si svilupparono nei primi anni Venti, per dare un'idea del clima letterario di allora. La conclusione si baserà sulla Risoluzione del 1925, che rappresentò la Magna Charta del Partito in ambito letterario sino ai primi anni Trenta.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.710
Threshold uncertainty score0.862

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectronic Theses and Dissertations Repository (University of Pisa)Same topicLaser Design and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207