MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7055273088

Catching air and the Superman

2010· dissertation· en· W7055273088 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2010
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Frequency and Time Standards
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Music Media and TechnologyMcGill University
KeywordsFluteSupermanMIDIMusicalElectronic musicRegister (sociolinguistics)ViolinViola
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This two-volume dissertation contains an analysis text (Volume 1) of the complete musical score for Catching Air and the Superman (Volume 2), which is an approximately fifteen-minute, one-movement composition for sixteen musicians.It features interactive electronics through an integration of gestural controllers, known as t-sticks, and acoustic instruments.In total, three digital instruments are heard in the work: MIDI keyboard and two soprano t-sticks.The acoustic instruments constitute a chamber orchestra: flute (piccolo), oboe, clarinet, tenor saxophone, baritone saxophone, trumpet, trombone, two percussion, two violins, viola and violoncello.The following analysis begins with a contextual examination of electronic music technology in relation to the compositional project.Next, the concepts and models of Catching Air and the Superman are outlined.The remainder of Volume 1 contains a detailed discussion pertaining to: compositional structure and form, spectral and pitch space, object and motif, rhythm, timing and tempo.Ce document en deux volumes comprend une analyse (volume 1) de l'intgralit de la partition (volume 2) de Catching Air and the Superman, une composition pour seize musiciens, en un mouvement, d'environ quinze minutes.L'oeuvre fait intervenir la fois des lments lectroniques, contrls par deux interfaces gestuelles, appels t-sticks, et des instruments acoustiques.Au total, trois instruments lectroniques peuvent tre entendus dans cette pice : un clavier MIDI et deux t-sticks sopranos.Les instruments acoustiques constituent un orchestre de chambre comprenant : une flte (piccolo), un hautbois, une clarinette, deux saxophones, un tnor et un baryton, une trompette, un trombone, deux jeux de percussions, deux violons, un alto ainsi qu'un violoncelle.L'analyse qui suit dbute par un historique de l'volution de l'usage des technologies lectroniques en composition pour arriver au contexte de ce projet spcifique.Les concepts et modles intervenant dans Catching Air and the Superman sont prsents la suite de cet historique.Le restant du volume 1 comprend une discussion dtaille des aspects suivants : structure et forme de la composition, espace spectrale et champ des hauteurs, traitement des objets sonores et travail motivique, rythmes, minutage et tempo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.373
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it