Centro de alto rendimiento deportivo en el distrito de San Juan de Miraflores
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La presente tesis tiene como finalidad el diseño de un CARD en el distrito de San Juan de Miraflores. El proyecto se enfoca en el desarrollo de los deportes de Basketball, Natación, Box y Vóley. \nSe propone cuatro unidades: Complementario, Medico, Residencial y Deportivo y está sustentado bajo el Reglamento Nacional de Edificaciones \nLos referentes Nacionales e Internacionales presentados y la información del IPD ayudo a saber las necesidades que los deportistas tienen. Además, la información recaudada del distrito de San Juan de Miraflores nos ayudó a ver las necesidades que la población tenía y así se pudo implementar espacios semi públicos para la ciudadanía \nPara concluir los CARD son edificaciones para el desarrollo profesional del deportista, en donde ellos pueden sentir que es su hogar, por ende, se brinda la mejor infraestructura y maquinaria de última generación.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".